Flat illustration of a large navy gate standing half open on a cream background, with a single coral key resting on the ground beside it
Sector News4 min read

NDIS Bill Passes the Senate: What Happens Next

The Senate agreed to the Securing the NDIS for Future Generations Bill on 18 August 2026. Here is what it changes and what still has to happen.

What happened today

The Senate agreed to the third reading of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026 on 18 August 2026, after agreeing to 32 government amendments in the Committee of the Whole the same day. Because the Senate changed the bill, it now goes back to the House of Representatives to agree to those changes before it can receive Royal Assent.

Four days earlier, on 14 August 2026, the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee tabled its final report on the bill. The report carried a single recommendation: that the bill be passed. The Australian Greens and Senator David Pocock each filed a dissenting report, and Coalition senators added their own comments. The full record sits on the committee's inquiry page at the Parliament of Australia.

This was not a quiet inquiry. The committee held six public hearings, and its report noted engagement from more than 4,500 organisations and individuals. Some submissions were still being published when the report was tabled.

What the bill actually does

The bill amends the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 across a wide field. According to the bill summary published by Parliament, it defines functional capacity, limits unscheduled plan reassessments, and clarifies that funded support needs must be directly related to a participant's eligible impairments.

It also introduces plan end dates and renewal processes, refines how reasonable and necessary supports are assessed, and gives the Minister a power to reduce funding for specified groups of supports. It changes the test for permanence by introducing the concept of all appropriate treatment, and it requires the NDIA to consider whether a person is eligible for other service systems when deciding access.

A separate block of measures expands the Agency's powers to identify and respond to fraud and non-compliance, and changes governance arrangements covering pricing decisions, indexation of older plans, and the automation of administrative actions.

The safeguards that were added along the way

Several changes came directly out of what people told the inquiry, and they are worth knowing about because they are the parts that protect individual participants.

The power to suspend or revoke a plan when a participant cannot be reached now comes with a definition of what a reasonable attempt to contact must include, a requirement that contact be made through accessible methods and through a nominee or support network where appropriate, and extra protection where the Agency knows the person is in hospital, in an institution, or experiencing homelessness.

On the permanence test, the report records that appropriate treatment does not extend to restrictive practices such as forced medication, and that a treatment only counts if it is available through Medicare, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme or the public health system. The committee also noted evidence from the Department and the Agency that participants will not be required to undertake unwanted medical procedures.

The Minister's power to reduce funding cannot be applied to daily living, transport, consumables, assistive technology or home modifications. Automated decision-making now comes with a requirement to publish a standard operating procedure instrument before it is used for evaluative decisions.

What this means if you already have a plan

Nothing in your current plan changes on the day a bill passes. Most of what this legislation does takes effect through rules and determinations made afterwards, and the timing of those is the thing worth watching rather than the vote itself.

The practical advice has not changed. Know which budget each of your supports is drawn from, because the changes ahead land unevenly across the three budgets rather than uniformly. If you are not sure how yours is split, our explainer on the main types of NDIS support is the place to start, and how your plan is managed affects who can answer questions about your spending.

Keep your contact details current with the NDIA. That was always sensible, and with a defined contact process now attached to plan suspension it matters more than it did.

What to watch next

Three things. Whether the House agrees to the Senate's amendments, which is the last step before assent. The transitional rules, where most of the practical detail will sit, and where the window for making them has been shortened to six months for many parts of the bill. And the determinations that set out which supports are reduced and by how much.

One longer-term marker is already fixed. An independent review of these reforms is to begin as soon as practicable after 5 September 2029, alongside the review of the 2024 Getting the NDIS Back on Track Act. It must examine access to the scheme, participant outcomes, review and appeal rights, provider viability, service delivery in thin markets, and how these changes interact with foundational supports. The Minister must table the resulting report in both Houses within 15 days of receiving it.

We will keep tracking the rules as they are published. If a change affects the people living in our supported homes, we would rather families hear it from us early than read it in a plan letter.

Want to talk this through for your situation?

Keep reading

More from the blog.

Let's find your place.

Speak with our team about vacancies, supports or day programs.

Call 1300 219 811 Start a chat